Have A Problem
It’s not a question of if Medicare patients are receiving unnecessary treatments and procedures. It’s a question of how many.
Or so says a recent study conducted by
Harvard Medical School researchers and published last month in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Researchers found 42 percent of Medicare
patients received at least one unnecessary medical procedure in a single year, and that the cost
of this care totals roughly $8 billion.
The data comes from a 2009 analysis of
Medicare claims for 1.3 million patients.
Harvard Medical school researchers closely examined the claims and
developed a list of 26 “low-value” procedures they deemed to reflect
overuse after consulting research evidence and taking into account recommendations from several medical groups.
The methodology employed by the researchers compelled me to wonder
about the statistics included in the results, especially because the individuals who conducted the study went so far as to release findings of an
additional analysis of the Medicare claims (where more conservative criteria
were used to determine the necessity of treatments and procedures). Those
results indicated only 25 percent of Medicare patients got at least one
unneeded procedure, and the cost added up to about $2 million.
While it would be foolish to argue against the assertion that some
Medicare patients are being overtreated, the extent of the problem is
very much in question. This is not to suggest that the lack of unassailable qualitative data should serve to mitigate the seriousness of the
problem of unnecessary healthcare treatment and cost in this country,
nor should it serve as an excuse to ignore it until additional data paints
a clearer picture of the problem. I believe, however, it is quite difficult to solve a problem of great significance when said problem is not
fully defined or measured. Overtreatment in healthcare is not an issue
exclusive to Medicare patients. A 2012 Institute of Medicine report
that focused on healthcare spending in the United States determined
approximately 30 percent of spending (or $750 billion) was related to
overtreatment or unnecessary cost.
Does a solution begin with educating patients about the importance
of understanding their illnesses, injuries, and ailments to ensure they
are receiving an appropriate amount of care? Does it begin with curbing
overzealous doctors who order more treatments and procedures to bring
in additional revenue and sidestep potential malpractice lawsuits? These
are difficult questions, and there is no easy way to go about answering
them without a better understanding of the scope of this problem.
Simply stated, we’re not there yet.
What’s your take?
Ansell provides a complete portfolio of safety solutions designed to
address sharps injuries in the operating room and ensure compliance
with OSHA, AORN, and the American College of Surgeons.
• Z-Friction Drape Neutral Zone
• Z-Tray & Stretch-A-Tray Hands Free Passing Trays
• Change-A-Blade - Safety Handle
• Disarm-It-All - Counting and Disposal Box – NEW! Removes beaver
blades, scalpels, blades, and syringe needles!
• Safety Shield – Prevents needlesticks when drawing medication from
• Guard-It - A safe alternative to the “scoop” technique.
The Pink Pad
The Pink Pad by Xodus Medical, Inc. is designed to be the safest,
most effective Trendelenburg positioning system for all procedures
that require steep table adjustments. The Pink Pad’s patented material
protects the patient's head, neck, and shoulders from nerve damage and
skin abrasion, while its unique high coefficient
of friction virtually eliminates the
risk of sliding during surgery. The Pink Pad offers
clinicians a best practice
Trendelenburg positioning solution for even the
most challenging cases.